portland light

pdxlightbw.jpg


Comments

Your photos -- at least the ones you post -- are consistently outstanding. Are you taking digital photos are using film? Are you making any modifications? Have yoiu been doing this photography thing for long? I've been dabbling amateur photography -- film only -- for about two years, but only have a handful of quality shots. I'm awed by your portfoliio, even the limited amount of stuff you've shared.

Comment number: 006492   Posted by: J.D. Roth on August 29, 2004 07:19 PM from IP: 63.225.81.249

Digital's the secret, JD -- no film/processing/printing costs, so you can take literally thousands of shots. I probably take 50 for every one I post, although I'm improving. That's the reason I went digital -- at the time (about four years ago), I could afford either a B&W darkroom setup or a good digital camera, and I figured I needed practice more than anything. I spent big on memory -- I have a 1Gb microdrive -- so I can store 400 raw or 600 superfine 1500x2400 jpg images on the camera.

I use a Canon Powershot G1 and Adobe Photoshop. I do some, but not a whole lot, of image manipulation -- digital images always need some sharpening, and I do some cropping and contrast adjustment. Oh, and I shoot colour and adjust to grayscale later -- B&W mode doesn't give the same quality.

The big drawback so far is that I haven't found a good way to make physical prints, but I am mostly content with web presentation for now.

Comment number: 006493   Posted by: senn on August 29, 2004 10:42 PM from IP: 67.166.82.95

Post a comment

















RSS Feed

CC0
To the extent possible under law, I have waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this weblog. This work is published from the United States. Further information.


Links: