|
one great idea, two lousy implementations
I'd link to del.icio.us, which is an online bookmarks manager that I've been playing with and quite liking, only there'd be no point. It fails to load at least as often as it works. My guess is that their server/s is/are badly overloaded. What good is a bookmark service that works half the time? Next I'm going to try spurl, which even allows you to interface with del.icio.us (when it's working, that is). It doesn't seem to be much more reliable at first glance though. Right now it's churning away trying to load in the next browser tab, but not getting anywhere. Oh wait -- it's finally loaded. Well, better that than timing out like del.icio.us, but it's still not much use if I just want to grab a bookmark and move on without having to wait for something else to load. Dammit, until I played with these things I didn't even know I wanted an online bookmarks manager. Bah. Comments I keep an export of the del.icio.us XML file of my bookmarks along with a parser locally I can't be arsed to do this. I agree that del.icio.us is the best interface around, but it just spends too much time being unavailable. What's sweet about spurl, apart from better uptime, is that it will import/export to/from del.icio.us really smoothly. I got it to yank all my del.icio.us links, and now I have two complete copies. I guess you could just use whichever one is up, and sync them every so often -- but I just want ONE reliable app! I forget if you use Firefox or not, but if you do: Foxylicious - Foxylicious is a Mozilla Firefox extension that integrates your del.icio.us bookmarks into your browser bookmarks. google.com is my bookmark manager
R Jedi -- I use Firefox at work (MacOSX), and will give foxylicious a try. Here at home I use Moz (WinXP) because the spousal unit got to Firefox first and I'm too damn lazy to set up profiles. Ralf -- not as funny as it sounds. Del.icio.us/spurl may solve this problem yet, but folder-based bookmark management (as in, the kind every browser offers) is practically useless. By the time you've got a few frequently-visited pages in accessible spots, anything else you grab is likely to moulder untouched and unorganised until link rot does it in. I have about 3500 sites bookmarked. I do actually use bookmarks, but not for all types of links. How to deal with this stuff better is the subject of my next grant proposal. Post a comment |
RSS Feed Links: spousal unit me copy Bloglines account Simpy account Connotea account OpenWetWare userpage blogroll: Archives: July 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 |
I keep an export of the del.icio.us XML file of my bookmarks along with a parser locally so I don't actually ever not have access to them, but it is really irritating not being able to dynamically edit/add to them when del.icio.us is down. So far del.icio.us works better (more like what I want) than any other bookmark manager, though.