on luck

Posting has been patchy lately because I find myself starting up the same pattern that precipitated my recent hiatus -- too much to think about, too much to cover here, what to do what to do? I will have to find a better way to cope than throwing up my hands, but for now I just want to highlight this brief but important observation by Rafe Colburn:

One of the biggest mistakes people make in assessing their success or failure is discounting the effect of luck. People prefer to think that they are masters of their own destinies but the truth is that in large parts we are victims of circumstance. Yes, you should avoid problems that you see and make the most of the opportunities that you are presented with, but luck is the main factor. Heck, I was born a white male American with responsible parents who placed a high premium on education. Furthermore, I was born during the period of time when a natural curiousity in computers and the Internet could lead to a decent career. That alone makes me luckier than a huge majority of the people in the world. People are fools not to take those sorts of things into consideration.
Rafe is absolutely right. Failure to take such luck into account is a large part of what makes Republicans. I don't mean conservatives, I mean Republicans -- the modern kind, like Bush Mere: mean-spirited, narrow-minded, empty-hearted assholes with an empathy deficit that would be terminal if there were such a thing as abstract justice. Her son is another perfect, if extreme, example: born into privilege, shielded all his life by that same privilege both from hardship and from the consequences of his own mediocrity, he has nothing but contempt for anyone who does not share his good fortune, which he firmly believes is not fortune but the consequence of his own natural superiority. Less spectacular examples abound; as the spousal unit likes to say, this is why we can't have nice things.

lost art | sennoma | 22 Oct, 2005 |

Comments

Re the patchy posting, do you think that maybe a theme would help? Particularly something along the lines of the Followup/Distraction article Kitty put up on delicious the other day -- drawing the threads of things you find interesting together with thoughts on how you can act on them?

Comment number: 006606   Posted by: Ralf on October 23, 2005 04:20 PM from IP: 128.109.131.47

Maybe. I dunno. I'm thinking of going light on the politics for a while, because it's just making me sick. I happen to think that's a reasonable reaction to the current state of US politics, but I'm going to have to get better at passing over the stuff I can't act on -- do what Kitty does: send the letter or donation and then put it from my mind.

Comment number: 006607   Posted by: senn on October 23, 2005 08:21 PM from IP: 24.21.137.118

Post a comment

















RSS Feed

Links:
spousal unit
me
copyright anything
Bloglines account
Simpy account
Connotea account
OpenWetWare userpage
monthly irregular column on 3QuarksDaily


Please sign the petition in support of the European Commission's proposed Open Access Self-Archiving Mandate

Please also sign the SPARC/ATA Petition for Public Access to Publicly Funded Research in the United States


blogroll:



Archives:
July 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003









Design thrown together haphazardly by frykitty.
Powered by the inimitable MovableType.