I'm swamped, but two quick points:
1. I'm not going to try to keep up with reactions to PRISM here, unless I think I have something potentially useful to add. If you want a news stream, read OAN or watch my PRISM tag on Simpy -- I'll grab everything I notice.
2. Peter Murray-Rust is blogging up a storm on publisher policies, copyright and Open Access:
- OUP wants me to pay for my own Open Access article - September 3rd, 2007
- OUP: Thank you for the response - September 4th, 2007
- Ingenta: It gets even worse; corrupt and resell - September 4th, 2007
- Access to WHO? - September 5th, 2007
- Copyright paralysis from the British Library - September 5th, 2007
- Copyright paralysis from the British Library - update - September 5th, 2007
- Ingenta: more comment - September 5th, 2007
There is a great deal of confusion regarding publisher policies and the rights of readers, scholars, institutions &c. I hope that publishers will agree with me that Peter MR is doing a sterling job of getting these issues out into the open, where they can be clarified -- to everyone's benefit.
Comments
Alethea, that's wonderful. As Peter MR has said in a later blog post, you and Richard may be the beginning of a wave of mass action, which could push through some much needed changes.
Post a comment
RSS Feed
To the extent possible under law, I have waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this weblog. This work is published from the United States. Further information.
Links:
(formerly Malice Aforethought)
me
spousal unit
Bloglines account
Simpy account
Connotea account
OpenWetWare userpage
googlebombs for good
Roe; Wade; Roe v Wade
abortion
Jew
Seldovia Herald
blogroll:
Archives:
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
October 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
I don't have an immense readership on my blog, but I do think this is a fantastically important issue: how do your results get out to other researchers? Will we have a choice in the future about how to publish? Why don't those believers in the PRISM coalition propose that our e-mails to one another, our forum participations, our coffee breaks also get taxed - a little information might be circulating without anyone paying for it a third time around!
So, I discussed this in my blog here:
http://humans.scienceboard.net/archives/2007/09/05/320/
as did Richard Grant in his here: http://blogs.usyd.edu.au/labrats/2007/09/money_1.html
and I'll be harassing others as much as I can to make them take notice.